James Beldock has a deep but fairly unnoticed trend data (age and school) from Facebook: Age
*DOES* Matter: On the Demographics of Social Networks
(well worth reading)
James Beldock has a deep but fairly unnoticed trend data (age and school) from Facebook: Age
*DOES* Matter: On the Demographics of Social Networks
(well worth reading)
A small useless fact …
Gang Leader for a Day: A Rogue Sociologist Takes to the Streets: Sudhir Venkatesh
This is a great book. If you read Freakonomics, you might remember Sudhir Venkatesh’s collaboration with Steven Levitt on the gang leader’s books. Venkatesh got the books after spending six years in the worst Chicago projects working with the Black Kings gang.
This is a story that shows the vicious circle many of our youth are trapped in. and the self-reflection of Venkatesh — at the time a poor sociology grad student.
Marc Andreessen suggested I read this book. I bought it 100% due to his recommendation and now I heartedly endorse it to others.
I love reading Paul Graham … I’ve read pretty much
everything he has written and while I don’t always agree, I always come away
from his articles with a new thought. In fact, I think he has most insightful blog/column out there.
Graham writes a new one entitled How to Disagree:
http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html
this is well worth reading. Many people have trouble disagreeing and the most common way to
discredit an argument is to go after the messenger. Graham points out this is a really a poor
argument as to why the messenger’s point is bad.
but most humans give too much weight to the messenger and not
enough weight to the message. That
makes sense from a purely evolutionary point of view. If Stephen Hawking says something about
physics, you might want to listen. But
if Britney Spears starts discussing string theory, you might think she’s talking
about bikinis and not theoretical physics. This reasoning works most of the time as usually Hawking has interesting
things to say about science and Spears is known for other talents.
But in politics and business, not listening to the messenger
can lead to very bad decisions. Giving
a little more weight to a new opinion of someone you like over those that you
dislike makes sense. But a good
decision maker should only weigh the messenger a little and focus much more on
dissecting the message. The boy who
cries wolf might be right sometime … you shouldn’t just reject the message out
of hand.
obviously this is some sort of bug or hack … but some hacker has 24,334,098,797 (24 billion) friends on MySpace.
according to the Wall Street journal today, Hillary Clinton was formerly a board member of Wal-Mart.
that was the first I’ve heard of this. i did some digging and, sure enough, Mrs. Clinton serves on the Wal-Mart board of directors from 1986 to 1992 (not long before she became first lady).
During those six years, Wal-Mart was one of the fastest growing companies in the world. This experience must have been one that us useful to Senator Clinton.
everyone who runs a tech company is cheering this news:
Many of you know that I play correspondence chess.
I annotated a recent game of mine that I should have lost but my opponent made a late-game mistake. Here is the game:
http://blog.chess.com/auren/when-you-are-down-fight-out-bue-the-ice-man
Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-by-Numbers Is the New Way to Be Smart
by Ian Ayres
very much enjoyed this book on how to better understand data. I recommend it.