Monthly Archives: April 2021
Harnessing tension within companies
Companies and orgs can promote and thrive from tension
All companies have tension.
There are at least two axes where tension resides:
- Long-term vs Short-term projects.
- Doing things right vs doing things fast.
This tension exists within a company, between departments, within a department, and even between cofounders. This tension is very healthy and often propels companies to succeed greater than they would without the tension.
Let’s dive in.
Doing things right vs doing things fast
This is the classic tension that many companies, especially start-ups, think about. Every individual has a personality trait that has them fall somewhere along the axis.
Mark Zuckerberg’s famous line “move fast and break things” was Facebook’s motto for its first ten years (2004-2014). Moving fast and putting out new features is why Facebook was so successful. But in 2014, Facebook decided to move on the axis from “doing things fast” to “doing things right” and Zuckerberg changed the motto to the less-catchy “Move Fast With Stable Infra.” That change is representative of the tension that exists within companies … and also the evolvement of all companies.
Most venture-backed start-ups err on doing things fast verses doing things right. Moving fast is the main advantage of a small organization because all large organizations move rather slowly. So one of the best vectors to compete against more entrenched incumbents is speed.
In my piece “Pace, Tempo, Speed, and OODA loops” I lead off with the quote from Jeff Bezos: “Being wrong might hurt you a bit, but being slow will kill you.”
The best strategy for larger organizations is to pick a small number of really important things to do — and make sure those things are done right. A great example of “do things right” strategy is Apple … but even Apple also needs to care about speed.
Even within companies, there is a LOT of tension between doings things fast and doing things right. If you were 100% on one side or the other, the company would almost surely fail.
Cofounders themselves can have conflict. I’ve seen successful start-ups with two cofounders where one has a “fast” personality and the other has a “right” personality. I’ve seen successful start-ups where both cofounders have “fast” personalities. Curiously — I have never seen a successful start-up where both founders have a “right” personality — those have always failed. In the end, speed wins for start-ups.Continue reading
Company tension 2×2
All companies have tension. Two axes:
Long-term vs Short-term projects.
Doing things right vs doing things fast.
Heuristic for when to hire employees vs hiring consultants
The correlation between EQ and compassion is really small
Data maturity depends on industry.
But all industries are getting more data oriented really quickly
Once you reach 40, you spend an increasing amount of time snagging errant ear-hairs with tweezers
Conflict can be good
Conflict is needed to make movies more interesting.
Conflict is also need to make meetings more interesting.
Diagram of how to make an email introduction
Definition of being rich
What is your definition of being “rich”?
Mine: being able to buy as many avocados as you want